Track record

The receipts.

Three businesses, three different revenue models, one method. This is the work the team behind Carcin did before distilling it into the product, with the sequence that produced each number.

Plate 01 · Client records · Series 2026 File · K-32-174-8291-A

Read the record before you read the numbers.

Whose record this is

The team behind Carcin ran growth for more than 1,000 businesses over 13 years. The three engagements below come from that work. They were run by people, by hand, one channel at a time, across years of trial and correction. Carcin did not run them, and none of these businesses is a Carcin customer.

That distinction matters, so it gets stated plainly rather than buried. What Carcin inherited from these years is the method: which channels move a given business model, what order they have to be worked in, and what breaks when that order is ignored. We distilled all of it into Carcin.

Why these three

They sell in three completely different ways. Boss PDX sells estimates to homeowners in one metro area. Teton Gravity Research sells product to a national audience through a store. LeadsRx sells software demos to a technical buyer who researches for months before ever talking to anyone. A contractor and a software company have almost nothing in common at the channel level, which is exactly the point. The method is the same. The channel mix is not.

The method, in one paragraph

Hub and spoke. The site is the hub, the single place every other channel points back to. The spokes are the channels: organic search, local listings and directories, paid media, reviews, email, content, analytics. A site on its own sells nothing, which is why it is treated as one channel among many rather than the finish line. Order is the strategy. Local service ads need a verified business profile first. A review engine needs somewhere to send people. Retargeting needs traffic to retarget. Every engagement below was sequenced against that dependency chain, and every number below is what came out the other end.

Case 01 · Construction · Portland

Boss PDX: $0 to $1M in annual sales.

Framing crew working on a timber structure
Residential construction · Portland, Oregon
$1M+
Annual Sales
200+
Estimates
50+
Page 1 Rankings

The situation

Boss PDX started at zero. No site, no rankings, no inbound leads. Work arrived by referral, which meant the pipeline moved when someone happened to mention the company at a barbecue and stalled when nobody did. A construction company with no digital presence is invisible at the exact moment a homeowner decides to hire, because that decision starts with a search.

What was done, in order

  1. Site built first, structured around the services actually sold and the metro actually served. This is the hub every other channel points at.
  2. Google Business Profile verified, categorized, and filled out. Nothing local ranks until this exists.
  3. Directories and citations, so the name, address and phone number agreed everywhere a search engine could find them.
  4. SEO on service pages and location pages, aimed at the phrasing homeowners use rather than the phrasing contractors use.
  5. Paid search, switched on once there were pages worth sending expensive clicks to.
  6. A review engine, asking every finished job for a review at the point where the customer is happiest.
  7. Email to the existing list, for repeat work and seasonal service.

What compounded

Rankings fed estimate requests. Reviews fed rankings and lifted the close rate on the estimates that came in. Paid search covered the gap while organic matured, then got narrowed as organic took over the terms it had been renting. None of those channels would have produced much alone. Deployed in that order, each one made the next one cheaper. The record for the engagement: 200+ estimate requests, 50+ page 1 rankings, and $1M+ in annual sales.

The order is the strategy. Not the channel list.
Carcin · Operating principle Anyone can hand a business owner a list of channels. The difference between a list and a result is knowing which one has to be working before the next one is worth paying for.
Case 02 · DTC ecommerce · National

Teton Gravity Research: 500% sales increase.

Small brand owner packing and managing online orders
Direct to consumer · Store and audience
500%
Sales Increase
7x
ROAS
10x
Email List Growth

The situation

An audience that already existed, and revenue that did not track it. The attention was real and the store underneath it was leaking: a checkout and catalog that made buying harder than it needed to be, paid media buying the same visitor twice, and almost no owned audience to sell to a second time. Every dollar of growth had to be re-bought from an ad platform.

What was done, in order

  1. Platform migration first. For an ecommerce business the store is the hub, and fixing the catalog and checkout before spending on traffic is the difference between compounding and pouring.
  2. Paid media restructured around what the new store could actually track, rather than the campaign structure it had inherited.
  3. Email lifecycle flows: welcome, abandoned cart, post-purchase, win-back. The list stops being a newsletter and starts being revenue.
  4. Retargeting, switched on once there was enough clean pixel data for it to mean anything.
  5. An affiliate program last, because affiliates send traffic to a store and a store that does not convert wastes them.

What compounded

The owned audience is the compounding asset here. Growing the email list 10x meant a growing share of every launch was sold to people who cost nothing to reach again, which took the pressure off paid and let the paid budget chase new customers instead of re-buying old ones. That is what a 7x return on ad spend looks like from the inside. Sales grew 500% over the engagement.

Case 03 · B2B SaaS · Portland

LeadsRx: 300% more demo requests.

300%
Demo Requests
50+
Page 1 Rankings
100+
Inbound Prospects

The situation

Marketing attribution software, sold to a technical buyer, in a category where every competitor bids on the same handful of keywords. That buyer researches for a long time before speaking to a salesperson, and reads documentation before reading a brochure. Paid search alone in that category means renting attention at auction prices against better funded competitors, forever.

What was done, in order

  1. An SEO content engine built against the questions buyers actually type, not the product features the company wanted to talk about.
  2. Documentation treated as a growth surface. Technical buyers arrive through docs, and docs that are indexable rank on the long tail nothing else reaches.
  3. App marketplace listings, placed where this buyer already shops for integrations rather than where the company wished they shopped.
  4. LinkedIn, aimed at the roles who own the budget for attribution.
  5. Retargeting across a research cycle long enough that a single visit was never going to close anything.

What compounded

Organic search became the primary growth channel, and it is the one that keeps working after the spend stops. Every article and doc page added to the surface area, the long tail pulled in prospects no keyword auction was serving, and retargeting held attention across a research cycle measured in months. The record for the engagement: 50+ page 1 rankings, 100+ inbound prospects, and 300% more demo requests.

Our team grew 1,000+ businesses over 13 years.
We distilled all of it into Carcin.

Provenance · Past work by the team behind Carcin, not Carcin's customer base

Your business is next on the list.

Two minutes to start. Then it never stops.

Usage-based pricing, starting at $19.99/mo · No contracts · Cancel anytime

Questions

The obvious objections, answered straight.

01 Are these businesses Carcin customers?
No. Boss PDX, Teton Gravity Research and LeadsRx were engagements run by the team behind Carcin, before Carcin existed. People did that work by hand. Carcin is the product built out of what those years taught. Nothing on this page describes Carcin's own customer base.
02 What results should I expect?
Carcin publishes no forecast. Outcomes depend on the trade, the market, the competition and the margin on the work being sold, and no honest number can be attached to a business sight unseen. What is consistent is the method: the channels that matter for the business model, worked in dependency order, continuously, with reporting on what moved. Treat any growth product that quotes you a percentage before it has looked at your market as a sales pitch.
03 Where do these numbers come from?
They are the figures reported by each business over the engagement, drawn from their own analytics, ad accounts and sales records. They are not independently audited, and they are the only outcome figures published for these three engagements. Any number not listed on this page does not exist.
04 Why only three case studies for 1,000 businesses?
The publishable record is 1,000+ businesses over 13 years. Most of that work sits under confidentiality, or predates the reporting needed to publish a number anyone could defend. Three engagements have both permission and measured figures, so three get a page. The rest stays a count, which is the honest way to carry it.
05 Does Carcin run the same playbook?
The method carries over: hub and spoke, dependency order, one channel unlocking the next, nothing switched on before the thing it depends on is working. The channel mix does not carry over. A contractor selling estimates, a brand selling product and a software company selling demos need different spokes in a different order, which is why Carcin classifies the business model first and picks the sequence from there.
06 Is Carcin a website builder?
No. A site is one channel among many, and on its own it sells nothing. Search, local listings, directories, paid media, reviews, email and content are the rest of the work, and they are what these three engagements were actually won on. A builder hands over a file and leaves. Carcin keeps working the channels.